Maybe it is just me… but I find mark schemes for level marked questions very vague and subjective. I might give it a level 1 but another teacher could justify a level 2. Like many teachers, I try and get my students to understand the mark schemes (even though us teachers struggle), but it was this idea, shared by Laura McQuade regarding her research using self regulation strategy development (SRSD) which has revolutionised how I get students to engage in mark schemes.
Simply put, students allocate scores to good components that you would expect to find in an answer. Here is how I have used it;
What to do:
1)Give students an exam question- allow them to answer it in pairs in a limited time on large paper.
In my first trial I used “Use a case study to describe the responses to river flooding” (an 8 mark AQA Geography GCSE question)
2) During a teacher led Q and A students feedback the criteria for a good answer
- Connectives – additional, also, another, etc
- facts and figures
- Naming the case study in the opening sentence
- 2 paragraphs- 1 on immediate responses 1 on long term
- using key words from the question – flooding/ responses
3) Students then gave each criteria a score. E.g. 10 marks for using describing connectives. 20 marks for facts and figures. I led them towards giving the most important aspects the highest score (e.g. if they don’t name a place they can’t get level 2 or 3- so gave this 100).
4) They then scored their answer. Every time they used a describing connective they got 10 marks. When ever they used a specific fact or figure they got 20 marks. Each time they wrote the place name AND they gave it a capital letter they got 5 marks.
5) Students reflected on where they gained and lost marks.
6) Students individually rewrote their answer- they tried to beat their original score
7) Final feedback task reflecting on what they had learnt.
This idea really helped students to see the important components of their answer. It put the mark scheme in simple terms and added an aspect of competition (which really engaged by middle ability boys).
Marking exams can always be a difficult process. There’s the emotion (for the teacher and the students) that grades aren’t where they should be and the realisation that students are still making the same mistake. It can also be very difficult for students to process any feedback other than the grade.
These ideas, courtesy of the fabulous @Laura_oleary allows students to engage with their feedback and close gaps.
When using either- I am very selective about which questions I give detailed feedback on. There is limited impact writing on every question what the students should have done to get full marks. Be selective and only give detailed feedback on a small number of questions.
The exam review sheet – how to use.
- Mark exam paper- highlight one question that the student will improve (throughout a class I will select no more than 3 questions that they will improve- this will make the resource making for point 5 easier to manage!)
- Students identify their target grade, their raw mark and how many marks they were off (or above their target) .
- They then do a question analysis to process individual question marks.
- Students then identify something they did well and something they did not do so well on (I might give examples, e.g. I attempted all the questions, I completed the case study questions well etc).
- Students then find their target question, and using resources I have made prior to the lesson they improve their answer.
- Finally students look at how their mark has improved.
Mock review sheets- how to use
This resource is great for larger exam
- students identify their target grade and read through the feedback given. I will give detailed feedback on a select number of questions
- The students then do a question analysis. The “how many marks lost by not attempting questions” is really interesting for students that this is an issue with.
- Students identify what they have learnt from the mock exam- this is usually skills/ technique focus (again I might give some examples).
- They identify a new priority for the next term/ year.
I first heard about marking sheets a few years back, but they were often used in conjuction with a mark book and purely for the teacher to see. Since then many of these feedback/marking crib sheet designs have floated around on Twitter- with the main difference being sharing this information with students. I first saw the idea from @MrThornton who (I believe) shared this idea first. This was then followed by ‘s version and I decided I had to have a trial and see what the hype was about. My version combines the two templates and works as follows:
- I carry out a book look through all the books- making notes as I go.
- In the heart shape I identify the names of students who have done very well.
- Identify those who need to finish work (and what the piece of work is).
- Check to make sure that there are not any misconceptions-if there are write an explanation of what that misconception is.
- List out the correct spellings of commonly misspelt words.
- In the “steps to progress” section list a number of tasks that students can complete to make progress- these tasks are differentiated.
- Photocopy the sheet for the class- give one to everyone.
- Students write out all spellings (I made everyone do this- practice makes perfect!)
- I made sure students who had unfinished work had the resources to complete.
- Students picked 1-2 tasks from the list and completed them. I told them to pick tasks that they felt challenged them, I checked which tasks they were completing and advised them to complete a different one if more appropriate. In future I might make a list of names of each student who should complete which task and display it on the board to ensure they are picking the appropriate ones.
+ it is definitely workload reducing- I “marked” 2 year 10 sets in one hour
+feedback can still be personalised
+ students want to be in the heart shape- it promotes positive ATL
+ students still make progress and close the gap in the knowledge/ skill they have not understood
– it can’t be used in isolation- students still need traditional feedback
– Next time I would definitely tell the students at least one task they should complete.
In my subject area, students, especially at GCSE or A-Level, have to produce notes- these are pieces of work which they can come back to at a later date to revise from. They might not show significant understanding or analysis but, they must have all the content if they are going to have the knowledge in the future. These pieces of work can be quite time consuming to mark and often the feedback given is “you need to include….”
A solution to this is the use of checklists. These can be printed off and students can then go through their work and check off that they have all the basic information. They can also then add anything they have identified as missing. A quick once over from you as the teacher means you can then go on to providing feedback on something which shows a greater level of thinking or skill. While there has to be some time invested at the start to create them, they are quite quick to make and can be used in future years. We divided ours up amongst the department to reduce workload and have all noticed our marking time of these pieces of work to have sped up. We have also found that students are producing better notes because they know what they need to include.